A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between potential neighbours around the development of the wall at a coastal web site inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario that has attracted countrywide consideration adhering to an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Times report about René Collier and the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has advanced into a very publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their loved ones home. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes along Ireland’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of founded people. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted beneath arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each inhabitants of Dublin Highway, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their setting up authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries in their web page, leading to an encroachment on a Specific Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, therefore spots are matter to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental regulation. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside a sensitive coastal atmosphere like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially crafted, is in the proper situation. Their legal staff has characterised the action as an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful advancement. The couple accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding in order to protect their see, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal scheduling disputes, where views of The ocean are both of those remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary efforts because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, As outlined by sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, a picture that has given that turn into emblematic from the depth of the dispute. These steps weren't simply symbolic; they were intended to Assemble Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location within the sea Irish Periods described, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the drinking water for the duration of significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm drinking water to photograph the location became one of the most placing descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions were being cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was getting encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up lined intimately from the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became widely searched phrases as audience sought to understand the track record and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to further submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt development pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical moment in the authorized timeline.
In the Main from the dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as manufactured, goes past what was permitted and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has become referred to as meticulous in his evaluation of setting up files, maps, and conditions attached towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their motion is enthusiastic by concern for environmental safety and adherence to planning law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving a private look at, insisting instead that it is about guaranteeing that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have got explained their extensive-standing link to the area and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply just wanting to create a spouse and children property in accordance With all the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Distinctive Place of Conservation and say that every one functions are actually carried out depending on Qualified advice and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the remarkable steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include getting into the sea during a storm, do not change the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description to get a circumstance that a lot of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation amongst personal land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become additional contentious.
The Irish Instances short article about René Collier pointed out Paul Feely and Rene Collier that the businessman had Beforehand been involved with local advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from pretty distinct Qualified backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Instances coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior h2o all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions and René Collier waded as a result of midsection-high h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in protection, reflecting both the physical truth of the coastline along with the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an too much method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result stays unsure. The courtroom ought to ascertain if the wall as constructed complies with planning authorization and no matter whether any encroachment into a Special Space of Conservation has happened. The legal arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and scheduling circumstances. Nevertheless the human aspect remains central: neighbours who need to Stay along with each other extended following the legal expenditures are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the situation extend over and above that deal with. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the importance of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. In addition, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges for instance environmental protection and home rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre in the dispute stands partially built, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful queries. No matter if it will eventually be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will rely on the courtroom’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probably keep on to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most closely viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin in recent times.